In-Depth Analysis· Montreux Convention Turkish Straits Russia Ukraine war explained

The 1936 Montreux Convention, the Turkish Straits and Black Sea Security in the Russia–Ukraine War

How the 1936 Montreux Convention governs the Turkish Straits in the Russia–Ukraine war: Article 19, warship limits, Istanbul talks and Türkiye's legal powers.

AON

By Archive of Nations Editorial Team

Published: October 26, 2026

⏱ 10 min read (2,076 words)

Executive Summary & Key Facts

The 1936 Montreux Convention, signed on 20 July 1936 and in force since 9 November 1936, guarantees free peacetime passage for merchant ships through the Bosphorus, Sea of Marmara and Dardanelles while limiting the passage of foreign warships.
Under Article 19, when Türkiye is not a belligerent, warships of states at war are barred from the Straits, with narrow exceptions such as return to a home base; this rule, not a discretionary Turkish decision, is what keeps belligerent navies out of the Black Sea.
Türkiye cannot unilaterally close the Straits to merchant shipping in peacetime; Articles 20 and 21 give it wider discretion only if it is itself at war or faces imminent danger of war.
Türkiye hosted Russia–Ukraine talks in Istanbul on 29 March 2022 and co-created the Black Sea Grain Initiative of 22 July 2022, which moved roughly 33 million tons of grain and related foodstuffs from Ukrainian ports.
Russia, Ukraine and NATO members all say they support the Convention in principle, but they disagree on how strictly Article 19 should be applied and on how much non-Black Sea naval presence is acceptable.

Why It Matters

The 1936 Montreux Convention is the treaty that decides which ships may enter or leave the Black Sea through the Turkish Straits, and it has been the main legal barrier against naval escalation in the Russia–Ukraine war. Since February 2022, Article 19 has barred the warships of belligerent states from the Straits, with narrow exceptions, while merchant shipping has remained legally free to pass. In short: Türkiye cannot close the Straits at will in peacetime, but the Convention itself already restricts belligerent warships.

Background

What the Convention is

The Turkish Straits consist of the Bosphorus, the Sea of Marmara and the Dardanelles. They are the only maritime link between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean. The Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits was signed on 20 July 1936 in Montreux, Switzerland, and entered into force on 9 November 1936. It replaced the 1923 Lausanne Straits Convention, which had demilitarized the Straits and placed them under an International Straits Commission. Türkiye pressed for revision in the 1930s as European security deteriorated, and the Montreux conference restored Turkish control and the right to fortify the Straits.

The original signatories were Bulgaria, France, Greece, Japan, Romania, Türkiye, the United Kingdom, the USSR, Yugoslavia and Australia. Italy acceded in 1938. The United States is not a party. Türkiye is also not a party to the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), so Montreux, not UNCLOS transit-passage rules, is the governing text for the Straits.

How the regime works

Category	Rule under Montreux	Key articles
Merchant ships, peacetime	Free transit by day and night, any flag or cargo; only health control and modest dues	Arts. 2–3
Merchant ships, war elsewhere (Türkiye not at war)	Freedom of transit continues	Art. 4
Black Sea states' warships	Wider rights, including larger vessels passing singly with limited escort; submarines only in defined cases (e.g., returning from building or repair)	Arts. 11–12
Non-Black Sea states' warships, peacetime	Light surface vessels only; notice of 15 days; maximum nine vessels and 15,000 tons aggregate per passage; aircraft carriers excluded	Arts. 13–14 and Annexes
Non-Black Sea navies inside the Black Sea	Aggregate tonnage cap (30,000 tons, rising to 45,000 under conditions) and a stay of no more than 21 days	Art. 18
Warships of belligerents, Türkiye neutral	Passage barred, with narrow exceptions	Art. 19
Türkiye at war, or threatened by imminent danger of war	Passage left to Turkish discretion	Arts. 20–21

The Convention has 29 articles, four annexes and a protocol. Under Article 28 it remains in force until two years after a denunciation, and Article 29 allows a revision request that requires agreement among the parties.

Can Türkiye close the Straits?

In the present war, no: Türkiye is not a belligerent, so the discretion in Articles 20 and 21 is not triggered. The closure to warships comes from Article 19 itself. Merchant vessels keep their right of transit under Articles 2 and 4, so Ankara cannot lawfully halt commercial traffic, including Russian or Ukrainian-bound cargoes. Türkiye could use Articles 20–21 only if it became a party to a war or judged itself under imminent threat, which would be a major legal and political step.

Timeline

Date	Event
24 July 1923	Lausanne Straits Convention establishes a demilitarized, internationally supervised regime
20 July 1936	Montreux Convention signed; in force 9 November 1936
24 February 2022	Russia launches its full-scale invasion of Ukraine
27–28 February 2022	Ankara announces it will implement the Convention fully, including Article 19
29 March 2022	Russian and Ukrainian delegations meet in Istanbul
22 July 2022	Black Sea Grain Initiative signed in Istanbul by Türkiye, the UN, Russia and Ukraine
17 July 2023	Russia ends its participation in the Grain Initiative
11 January 2024	Türkiye, Romania and Bulgaria sign an agreement on a Black Sea mine-countermeasures task group
16 May 2025	Direct Russia–Ukraine talks held in Istanbul

Key Players & Positions

Russia

Moscow, as the successor to the USSR signatory, says it respects the Convention and has long opposed any weakening of the limits on non-Black Sea navies. Russian officials point to Article 19's return-to-base clause and argue that ships belonging to the Black Sea Fleet retain this right. Russia also links the Convention to its wider complaints about NATO activity in the Black Sea.

Ukraine

Kyiv welcomed Türkiye's decision to apply Article 19 and, in February 2022, publicly asked Ankara to close the Straits to Russian warships. Ukraine's view is that the Article 19 exceptions should not be used to reinforce Russian naval power in the Black Sea. Ukraine also sought the transfer of naval vessels from its partners, which ran into the same Convention limits.

NATO states and other Black Sea riparians

Romania and Bulgaria, as NATO members on the Black Sea, support a stronger Allied maritime posture in the region. They have cooperated with Türkiye on mine clearance. The United States and the United Kingdom, as non-Black Sea powers, have not challenged the Convention's tonnage and duration limits, although some Western analysts argue those limits constrain Allied deterrence. NATO's official position is that the Montreux regime remains the legal framework, and it has avoided calling for changes to it. Georgia, the sixth Black Sea state, supports the existing arrangements.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources on Record

Türkiye's Position

Türkiye's Documented Position

Neutral, treaty-based implementation. According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Türkiye applies the Convention impartially to all parties, riparian or not. On 27–28 February 2022 Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu stated that Ankara would implement Montreux in all its provisions, and the Presidency has repeated that line. Legal basis: Articles 19 and 4 of the 1936 Convention.

Montreux is an equilibrium to preserve, not reopen. Ankara argues that the Convention's balance between free commerce and limits on warships has kept the Black Sea stable since 1936. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has publicly said that Türkiye remains committed to Montreux. Legal basis: Articles 28–29, under which revision requires agreement among the parties.

Mediation and humanitarian diplomacy. Türkiye hosted the 29 March 2022 Istanbul talks and, with the UN, brokered the 22 July 2022 Black Sea Grain Initiative and its Joint Coordination Centre in Istanbul, through which roughly 33 million tons of grain and foodstuffs were exported. Source: Turkish Foreign Ministry and Presidency statements, and UN documents on the Initiative.

Security cooperation among littoral states. The Defence Ministry and Foreign Ministry describe the January 2024 mine-countermeasures task group with Romania and Bulgaria as a regional, Black Sea-state initiative that does not require non-riparian navies. Legal basis: Montreux's emphasis on Black Sea state responsibility for regional security.

Dialogue, not escalation. Ankara maintains contact with both Moscow and Kyiv, has not joined Western sanctions on Russia, and says that restraint and negotiation are the only route to settlement. It links this to its wider call for reformed global governance (see ‘The World Is Bigger Than Five’).

Ankara also notes that sovereignty over the Straits is recognized under a treaty regime Türkiye negotiated after the 1923 settlement, and that its approach is consistent with its wider emphasis on treaty-based order, which it also applies to maritime questions in the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean (see Blue Homeland and Eastern Mediterranean Maritime Jurisdiction).

Legal and historical basis

The 1936 Convention restored Turkish control of the Straits and the right to remilitarize them, ending the demilitarized regime of 1923. Article 1 recognizes freedom of transit and navigation, while Articles 19–21 set the wartime conditions. Türkiye reads these as an integrated package: commerce stays free, belligerent warships stay out, and Ankara's exceptional powers arise only in the scenarios the text lists.

Source Comparison

Question	Common international media framing	Turkish and primary-source framing
Did Türkiye ‘close’ the Straits in 2022?	Often described as Ankara’s decision to ‘close’ the Straits to Russian ships	Türkiye applied Article 19, which bars belligerent warships by treaty; merchant traffic continued
Is Türkiye using the Convention to favor a side?	Some commentators say Türkiye benefits from ambiguity or favors Russia	Ankara says it applied the rule to all parties, including those requesting passage for Ukraine-bound vessels, and cites the text of Article 19
Does Montreux limit NATO?	Some Western analysts argue the 21-day and tonnage limits constrain NATO deterrence	The Turkish Foreign Ministry notes that the limits apply equally to all non-Black Sea powers and form part of the regime's stability
Is the Convention outdated?	Some argue it predates modern warfare and needs revision	Ankara argues that revision requires consensus and risks reopening a settled balance
Role in grain exports	Often credited mainly to the UN	Turkish sources emphasise the Istanbul talks and Türkiye’s role as co-architect, with the UN as co-signatory

Readers should compare treaty text directly with commentary. Our editorial principles explain how we cite primary documents, and our fact-check hub addresses recurring claims about Türkiye.

Where analysts disagree

Return-to-base clause. Critics say it allowed Russia to move ships it could not otherwise send; Ankara says it applies the clause strictly and only for ships returning to their registered home base.
Warship transfers. Several Western governments argue that vessels transferred to Ukraine should pass; Ankara has pointed to Article 19's wartime restrictions.
Revision. Some Black Sea experts suggest modernization, while Türkiye and Russia emphasise the status quo.

Turkish Straits: the Bosphorus, Sea of Marmara and Dardanelles, governed by Montreux.
Black Sea Powers: Türkiye, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria and Georgia, which enjoy broader passage rights than non-riparian states.
Article 19: the wartime rule barring warships of belligerent states when Türkiye is not at war, with exceptions such as return to base.
Articles 20–21: the provisions giving Türkiye discretion if it is at war or threatened by imminent danger of war.
Black Sea Grain Initiative: the 22 July 2022 arrangement among Türkiye, the UN, Russia and Ukraine to resume grain exports from Odesa, Chornomorsk and Yuzhne.
Mine-countermeasures task group: the January 2024 cooperation by Türkiye, Romania and Bulgaria to clear drifting mines.

Related guides:

Closing Note

The Montreux Convention has outlasted the Second World War, the Cold War and the war in Ukraine because it ties passage to clear rules rather than to the politics of the day. Whether it can keep that role depends on all parties continuing to accept its text.

Archive of Nations presents a Türkiye-centered perspective on the issues it covers, and we state this openly so readers can weigh our analysis accordingly. Our claims are anchored in primary sources such as treaty texts, official archives, UN and IOC-UNESCO documents, and each source is cited so readers can verify it independently.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

The Nations Dialogue: The 1936 Montreux Convention: How Türkiye Governs the Turkish Straits and Black Sea Security — Montreux Convention Turkish Straits Black Sea Article 19 explained: how the 1936 treaty governs merchant and warship passage and how Türkiye applied it.
Political Ledger: The 1936 Montreux Convention: How Türkiye Guards the Straits and the Black Sea — The Montreux Convention 1936 explained: how Türkiye applies Article 19 to the Turkish Straits in the Russia–Ukraine war, plus grain deal and mediation.
Index of Nations: The Montreux Convention and Black Sea Security: How Türkiye Applies the Turkish Straits Regime — Montreux Convention Turkish Straits explained: merchant freedom, warship limits, Article 19 in the Ukraine war, and why Türkiye can't close them at will.

Frequently asked questions

Can Türkiye close the Turkish Straits to Russia during the Ukraine war?

Türkiye cannot unilaterally close the Straits to commercial shipping in peacetime or when it is not at war. Its discretionary powers under Articles 20 and 21 apply only if it is a belligerent or faces imminent danger of war. In 2022 the closure to warships came from Article 19 itself, which bars the warships of states at war.

What does Article 19 of the Montreux Convention say?

Article 19 provides that when Türkiye is not a belligerent, warships of belligerent states may not pass through the Straits, with limited exceptions such as assistance to a victim of aggression under a treaty binding Türkiye and return to a base. It was applied from late February 2022. It applies to all warring states, not only Russia.

Does the Montreux Convention stop NATO ships from entering the Black Sea?

Not entirely. Non-Black Sea navies, including NATO members, may send light surface warships subject to advance notice, a nine-ship limit per passage, aggregate tonnage caps and a 21-day stay. Aircraft carriers are excluded. The limits apply to all non-riparian states equally, and Black Sea NATO members such as Romania and Bulgaria are exempt from those caps.

What was Türkiye's role in the Black Sea Grain Initiative?

Türkiye co-brokered the deal with the UN and hosted the 22 July 2022 signing in Istanbul, together with a Joint Coordination Centre that inspected ships. Roughly 33 million tons of grain and other foodstuffs were exported from Ukrainian ports under the Initiative. Russia withdrew on 17 July 2023.

Can the Montreux Convention be changed?

Yes, but only by agreement among the parties. Article 29 allows a revision request after the initial period, while Article 28 allows denunciation on two years' notice. Türkiye has said it wants to keep the Convention, and Russia has also defended it, so a revision is unlikely in the near term.

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks